Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Drill and Kill or Positive Reinforcement: Behaviorism in Modern Education


          When an educator mentions behaviorism as a theory of learning today, he may be met with the same “Blech!” that he is met with when assigning homework to a class of unmotivated high school students.  The reality is that both have their place in the modern classroom.  Reinforcing effort, providing recognition, and providing practice to increase learning are tied to the ideas of the behaviorist learning theory and can have a positive effect on modern classrooms.
            Behaviorism is “primarily concerned with observable and measurable behaviors” (Orey, 2001).  Observable behavior may be student behavior in the classroom and fall under the realm of classroom management, but it may also be student participation in classwork or homework.  While a score may represent a student’s learning, whether or not he did the work may represent more of a behavior.  Teachers can use behaviorist theory by modeling, shaping and cueing as well as by modifying a desirable or undesirable behavior in class. 
            Reinforcing effort and providing recognition are practices that teacher should use regularly to build lifelong learners.  Success is the result of many factors, but research shows that self-efficacy plays a strong role in motivation for learning and achievement (Pittler, Hubbell, & Huhn, 2012, p. 57).  Helping students build that intrinsic motivation is what teachers can do to build a solid foundation for future success.  Teaching students about the relationship between effort and achievement, providing guidance as to how to show strong effort, and having students track their effort better engages students in their own learning processes (Pittler, Hubbell, & Huhn, 2012, p. 58). Using charts (or better yet electronic spreadsheets that older students create), rubrics for self-evaluation, and websites such as SurveyMonkey are all ways that teachers can make classrooms more student-centered as they monitor the correlation between their effort and success.  Making sure to reinforce the behavior or task that is achieved is significant; praising the person or his ability may have a negative effect on intrinsic motivation (Pittler, Hubbell, & Huhn, 2012, p. 62).  As teachers reinforce positive behavior (reinforce effort) and provide meaningful recognition, a pleasant environment emerges.  Behaviorist B. F. Skinner stated, “Things we call pleasant have an energizing and strengthening effect on our behavior” (Orey, 2001). 
            Is homework and extra practice energizing for most students?  As teachers, it is our job to try to make it so.  Assigning meaningful assignments that have a clear purpose and are short, focused, and distributed over time as well as providing feedback on the practice sessions are all good practices when it comes to the practice teachers assign (Pittler, Hubbell, & Huhn, 2012, p. 169). Setting students up for success helps to build their intrinsic motivation to do well and exhibit hard work and effort.  A modern way of adding interest and using technology is to try a “flipped” classroom where a teacher uses multimedia to present the teacher-centered lecture component of the lesson at home and then serves as a “learning coach” at school (Pittler, Hubbell, & Huhn, 2012, p. 172). Online tutorials at home or at school are other ways that students can receive that essential immediate feedback during their practice. Online drills such as this reinforce the behaviorist theory by demonstrating programmed instruction that B. F. Skinner advocated (Laureate Education, Inc., 2011).
            “Blech!”  Hopefully this exclamation is not a part of the modern classroom when ideas such as behaviorism and homework are mentioned.  Reinforcing behaviors that will lead to learning and intrinsic motivation is what we need to be doing as educators.  Using technology in a way that allows us to reinforce and recognize that positive behavior as meaningful practice takes place is a way to update a theory that many consider to be outdated and dead.
            Below are two links I thought were of interest; the first, to a blog about making homework meaningful and the second, an interactive website students can use in class or at home to practice grammar concepts from the classroom.      

           
References
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011). Program four: Behaviorist learning theory [Video
            webcast]. Bridging learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved from
            http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.e  
          college.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E. R., & Kuhn, M. (2012). Using technology with classroom instruction that
          works (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD
Orey, M. (Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved

            from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page

5 comments:

  1. I enjoyed reading your blog post. It was very well written. A lot of times when behaviorism is brought up in discussion it is related to students’ behavior. However, I am glad that you mentioned that it can also be about student participation in class work or homework which is important to remember. It is not always easy to motivate a classroom full of students especially in the higher grade levels. In my opinion an unmotivated classroom can increase negative behaviors and decrease student achievement. Integrating technology into the classroom curriculum is a very power strategy in relation to behaviorism because students are motivated by technology and they are learning in the process. Homework and normal rote and drill instruction could be considered boring to many students, but if it is disguised in the form of educational software students seem to be more willing to learn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shonda,
      I agree that technology is key, especially for my high school students. I find myself having to stay one step ahead of them. They are whizzes when it comes to some aspects of technology, but I always enjoy being able to bring something new that they didn't know about. Using Google Apps for Education in the classroom this year was that new piece for me this year. Next year, I'll have to find something else!

      Delete
  2. You mention a valid point that is very controversial in classrooms today. You state that while a score may represent a student’s learning, whether or not he did the work may represent more of a behavior. I teach 8th grade math as well as advanced algebra for 9th graders. Every year administration places a few students into alegebra based on high placement scores or high state testing scores, not taking into account the work ethic of these students. Every year, I have 2-3 students who fail algebra as 8th graders and have to re-take it as freshmen, not because the content knowledge is not there, but simply because they do not put in the work. No matter how much I use behaviorist theory by modeling, shaping and cueing as well as by modifying a desirable or undesirable behavior in class, some students just choose not to put in the extra effort it takes to be successful in an advanced class. Do we continue to place these students on an advanced track because the content knowledge is there, even though the self-motivation is not? I would love to hear your thoughts!
    Also, I really enjoyed your website about making homework meaningful. Thank you!
    Brianna

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Brianna,
      This is a tough question to answer, especially at this time of year when I am looking at some of my students who are failing English 10 for the second time. One student has passed his English 11 end of course state test, but he may fail my class. Does he really need to stay behind? What do we do with that gap in performance? At the eighth grade level, I think that there is a maturity factor that plays into it. Ultimately, I think the answer falls in our districts and whether they are skill based in theory or grade based. As an eighth grade teacher, I would fail the student. I may be an excellent driver, but if I can't follow the rules of the road, then I will face the consequences. As an eleventh grade teacher, I would lose plenty of sleep and would have been calling home starting in December to make sure I was never put in that place! The student should have consequences; accountability must take place; behaviorism should be a part of the strategy. Finding the best answer, in my opinion, should be on a case by case basis as students get older.

      Delete
  3. Erin,
    Trust me, I agree with everything you say, and have lost plenty of sleep. Believe it or not, I have lost more sleep over the lack of interest of the parents of these students. There is no doubt in my mind about failing these students. I continue to fight an internal battle that tells me that these students would still fail in a regular class simply because of work ethic and behavior. I am in an unfortunate district where teachers do not get much say in the class placement for students. Therefore, I would say my district is definitely a "skill based" district. Thanks for your thoughts!
    Brianna

    ReplyDelete